Ingleton Bolt Seminar.
It is
generally agreed amongst all cavers that the “best” anchors to use for a belay
(be it SRT or ladders) are naturals such as threads or flakes which have the least impact on the cave environment
and on the whole are the most reliable. However, in order to gain a “safe hang”
and avoid rope rub or an impossibly wet descent a compromise is reached by the
use of bolts which when well placed and properly maintained give a safe and
discreet means of descent.
The
problems arise when permanent fixtures such as the ubiquitous MB self drilling
rock anchor, begins to fail (eg. Rowten Pot incident), usually by
misuse by a large number of parties. This led to the all too familiar
condition of “bolt rash” where certain groups rebolted
popular routes not trusting the myriad of other bolts placed by other
mistrusting cavers.
It is not
realistic to simply rebolt a route when the present
bolts are unsafe as all bolts require sound rock if they are to be safe. Clearly
this is a finite resource at pitch heads and they will not last forever. It is
easy for people to think that permanent bolts are the answer merely because
they last up to 7 or 8 times as long as a standard M8, however the conclusions
of the seminar were that as permanent bolts cannot be removed once installed
bolt—rash will still occur but only at a later date. To avoid this a “semi permanent” design was agreed upon which could
not be removed without considerable effort and forethought. This would be done
when the safety of the bolt became questionable and a new semi-permanent bolt
placed in the existing hole. Before arriving at this conclusion several other
options were considered and the various advantages and disadvantages of bolts
discussed.
Potentially
available rock anchors.
M8 self
drilling rock anchor: (see
diagram) Widespread use, some in lethal state. 5 years expected life, failure
by enlargement of threads due to gritty bolt insertion and rusting.
M8(Austenitic stainless steel)
Not available
presently but possible that they could be manufactured en masse. No rusting
problems, 15 years expected life, failure by thread enlargement but bolt harder
than hanger.
L8 (Martensitic stainless steel):
Also
not presently available with no rusting problems. 10 years expected life. Failure
by thread enlargement.
Expanding
bolt fixings: eg. Rawl bolt(M12E):
Not used
presently due to theft problems but bolts placed am removed at every trip in
Pant Mawr causing enlarged holes. Failure
by shearing of bolt at root of thread. Lifetime of hole is around 1O0
annual replacements.
Petzl P38 hanger: see diagram:
This bolt
has a permanent hanger and is totally made of stainless steel, eliminating
rust. Expected lifetime 30 years. Mode of failure is
likely to be rotation of the bolt in the hole causing a reduction in
compressive grip between bolt and limestone.
No proper feasibility studies of the removal of these bolts
is known of but drilling out the
locking pin seems the only possibility. This would be extremely difficult and
time consuming.
Safety Harness
Eyebolt: (Hilti/Rawlbolt)
This bolt
will not fail under any of the loads generated by SRT practice and conforms to
BS5845. It is reported that the resin in the Rawlplug
version will decay by water damage. These require a 19mm hole! for insertion and has an expected life of about 100 years
(this is the theoretical lifetime)
Stud
Anchors (often used by window cleaners):
Having the
best strength to weight ratio this was considered but rejected as there is no
removable version. Expected life 20 years.
Chemically
Fixed Eyebolts:
These can
divided into two types: Petzl P40 and a DMM design
currently used on some BMC owned crags.
Petzl P40: (see diagram) A galvanised eyebolt
with an extremely high strength (over 4 tonnes).
Rejected as it is not available in stainless steel and removal would be
virtually impossible.
DMM
stainless resin hanger:
(see diagram) Removable, very strong (c.2 tonnes),
cheap (consists of a single 8mm stainless bar). Placed in an 18mm hole 50mm deep. Removal by drilling out exposed resin and
twisting out leaving an undamaged hole ready for- bolt replacement. This DMM
design was decided upon to replace bolts on heavily used routes such as Gaping
Gill, Ireby Fell Cavern and Lancaster Hole. Some have
already been placed for testing purposes in Yordas
Pot, Kingsdale proving to be very strong. Plans for rebolting are being
coordinated through the NCA. It is not proposed to rebolt
every cave with the new design which would be too expensive and time consuming, only the popular caves. In caves such as Crescent
or Quaking Pot the stainless variety of MS may be appropriate as it would
receive so little use.
Paul
Wilkinson.

BACK TO: Volume Contents